AUSTRALASIA
Tod’s S.p.A. v Jiang & Hou Pty Ltd. [2015] ATMO 5
Applications for VANESSA HOGAN and the below VANESSA HOGAN and Device trade marks were opposed by Tod’s S.p.A. The opponent is the owner of a number of prior ‘HOGAN’...
Applications for VANESSA HOGAN and the below VANESSA HOGAN and Device trade marks were opposed by Tod’s S.p.A. The...
Read More
AUSTRALASIA
Drafting Guidelines in Light of S40(3) Amendments
S40 of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) is related to internal validity of a patent specification and, in essence, provides rules for drafting patent applications. Until 15 April 2013,...
S40 of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) is related to internal validity of a patent specification and, in essence,...
Read More
AUSTRALASIA
Leave to Appeal to the High Court Granted in Myriad Gene Patent Case
The High Court of Australia has granted special leave to Yvonne D’Arcy to appeal the high profile Full Federal Court decision1 affirming the patentability of naturally-occurring genes...
The High Court of Australia has granted special leave to Yvonne D’Arcy to appeal the high profile...
Read More
AUSTRALASIA
Combined Communications Pty Ltd v Combined Communication Solutions Pty Ltd [2014] ATMO 117
Combined Communications (CC) opposed the registration of the Combined Communication Solutions (CCS) trade marks; COMBINED COMMUNICATION SOLUTIONS and the COMBINED COMMUNICATION SOLUTIONS Logo. The opponent, CC, asserted that it was...
Combined Communications (CC) opposed the registration of the Combined Communication Solutions (CCS) trade marks; COMBINED COMMUNICATION SOLUTIONS and the...
Read More
AUSTRALASIA
Mars Australia Pty Ltd v Delfi Chocolate Manufacturing [2014] ATMO 113
Mars Australia opposed the registration of the trade mark MALTITOS by Delfi Chocolate pressing sections 44 and 60 of the Trade Marks Act. The MALTITOS trade mark application covered confectionary...
Mars Australia opposed the registration of the trade mark MALTITOS by Delfi Chocolate pressing sections 44 and 60 of...
Read More
AUSTRALASIA
101Domain, Inc v BB Online UK Ltd [2014] ATMO 120
101Domain, Inc., opposed the Australian designation of BB Online UK’s trade mark. The applicant operates a website www.101domains.com and the opponent operates a website www.101domain.com and utilises the trade mark...
101Domain, Inc., opposed the Australian designation of BB Online UK’s trade mark. The applicant operates a website www.101domains.com and the...
Read More
AUSTRALASIA
C Coconut Water Pty Ltd v Natural Raw C Pty Ltd [2014] ATMO 119
C Coconut Water opposed registration of the trade mark RAWC for beverages in Class 32, filed by Natural Raw C. The opponent attempted to argue that the applicant’s trade mark...
C Coconut Water opposed registration of the trade mark RAWC for beverages in Class 32, filed by Natural Raw...
Read More
AUSTRALASIA
Aoan International Pty Ltd [2014] ATMO 118
Ex Parte Hearing into the registrability of the trade mark MH370 for entertainment and publication services in Class 41. Initially, the Trade Marks Office objected to the application under section...
Ex Parte Hearing into the registrability of the trade mark MH370 for entertainment and publication services in Class 41. Initially,...
Read More
AUSTRALASIA
Janssen Biotech, Inc v Celltrion, Inc. [2014] ATMO 121
This matter concerned an opposition by Janssen Biotech to the protection of an International Registration owned by Celltrion, Inc., in Australia. The relevant trade marks are shown below, each...
This matter concerned an opposition by Janssen Biotech to the protection of an International Registration owned by Celltrion, Inc.,...
Read More
AUSTRALASIA
Q1 CTS 34498 Body Corporate v Q1 Management Pty Ltd [2014] ATMO 116
This Hearing concerned the opposition by Q1 CTS to the registration of the trade marks ‘Q1’ and ‘Q1 Resort & Spa’ by Q1 Management. Much of these matters were...
This Hearing concerned the opposition by Q1 CTS to the registration of the trade marks ‘Q1’ and ‘Q1 Resort...
Read More
AUSTRALASIA
Bridgestone Licensing Services Inc v Marshalls Mono Limited [2014] ATMO 114
Marshalls Mono’s Australian designation of its FAIRSTONE trade mark covering paving and building materials in Class 19 was opposed by Bridgestone pursuant to sections 42(b), 44, and 60 of...
Marshalls Mono’s Australian designation of its FAIRSTONE trade mark covering paving and building materials in Class 19 was opposed...
Read More

Find Your Expert

Experts

Contact Us

Enquiries

Receive Insights

Subscribe