Trade Marks

Australian Homestay opposed the registration of the trade mark filed by Homestay covering Class 43 accommodation services. The opponent led evidence of its use of the trade mark dating back...

This matter concerned the opposition by Shine Beauty to the non-use removal of its trade mark registration SHINE filed by Shine Ltd. Shine Beauty led evidence of its use of...

Pharaoh applied to register the below CRISTIANA and Unicorn device that application was initial rejected on the basis of a prior registration for CRISTIANA Device owned by Jonglea. The citation...

Arlec filed an application for the removal, for non-use, of the Schneider trade mark registration for the shape of an electrical switch.  Schneider opposed the removal of its registration. Both...

Tangerine applied for the non-use removal of Rudducks registration for ‘Vetzplus’.  Rudducks opposed the removal of its registration. The Hearing Officer found that there had been no actual commercial sales...

Wenger applied to remove the Courier Luggage trade mark registration for the mark on the grounds of non-use. The removal application was opposed by Courier Luggage. Courier Luggage led evidence of...

G8 applied for permission to file further evidence in relation to Light Path’s opposition to G8’s LE GEAR trade mark application. Evidence in Support, Answer and Reply were filed by...

The applicant applied to register its trade marks WELLANATION CLINICS and WELLANATION.  Both trade marks were rejected under section 41, on the grounds that neither had the required capacity...