Poisonous Priority: Is it a problem?
The European Patent Office (EPO) recently issued its reasoned decision clarifying the EPO’s stance regarding partial priority (sometimes called multiple priorities).  But what is the relationship between poisonous priority...
The European Patent Office (EPO) recently issued its reasoned decision clarifying the EPO’s stance regarding partial priority (sometimes called...
Read More
AUSTRALASIA
The importance of Swiss-style claims in Australia
The Federal Court has recently issued a decision that highlights the importance of including Swiss-style claims in Australian pharmaceutical patents. As reported previously, the Federal Court (Nicholas J) confirmed in Apotex Pty...
The Federal Court has recently issued a decision that highlights the importance of including Swiss-style claims in Australian pharmaceutical...
Read More
SOUTHEAST ASIA
Thailand Update: New Specialized Appeal Court will benefit IP matters
The judiciary structure for intellectual property (IP) cases in Thailand has changed, following the opening of a Specialized Appeal Court on 1 October 2016. With the opening of the...
The judiciary structure for intellectual property (IP) cases in Thailand has changed, following the opening of a Specialized Appeal...
Read More
AUSTRALASIA
Tomkin Australia Pty Ltd v Jab Design Pty Ltd [2016] ATMO 73
Tomkin Australia opposed the registration of the below trade mark, which was applied for by Jab Design Pty Ltd and covers ‘plastic tray’ in Class 21. The applicant was the...
Tomkin Australia opposed the registration of the below trade mark, which was applied for by Jab Design Pty Ltd...
Read More
AUSTRALASIA
Insight Radiology Pty Ltd v Insight Clinical Imaging Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 1406
Background Insight Clinical Imaging Pty Ltd (ICI) and Insight Radiology Pty Ltd (IR) both conduct medical imaging businesses in Australia. Since 2008, ICI has been operating in Western Australia and has...
Background Insight Clinical Imaging Pty Ltd (ICI) and Insight Radiology Pty Ltd (IR) both conduct medical imaging businesses in Australia. Since...
Read More
AUSTRALASIA
Volvo Trademark Holding AB v Timken UK Limited [2016] ATMO 91
Volvo opposed the extension of protection to Australia of the trade mark REVOLVO covering goods and services in Classes 7, 12, and 42, including items for use in relation...
Volvo opposed the extension of protection to Australia of the trade mark REVOLVO covering goods and services in Classes...
Read More